HostWNUSDT0 vs WMON — price, size and safety, side by side
WNUSDT0 (Monad) vs WMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WNUSDT0 vs WMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WNUSDT0 | WMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.02 | $0.02231 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $613.61K | $1.00M |
| Liquidity | $1.35M | $1.19M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 190 | 296 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WMON measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of WNUSDT0
What the data says
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
WMON
WMON is wrapped MON — the ERC-20 form of Monad's native token that pools and routers actually compose, the same pattern as WETH on every other chain. The deployment 0x3bd359c1119da7da1d913d1c4d2b7c461115433a is Monad's canonical wrapper; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest wrapper note: WMON is mechanically the simplest claim in this index — a 1:1 deposit receipt for native MON issued by the canonical wrapper contract, with no custody between the holder and the asset beyond the wrapper contract itself. The asset's value is Monad's adoption; the wrapper is just plumbing.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNUSDT0 or WMON?
By tracked market cap: WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures — and WMON (Monad) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNUSDT0 or WMON?
On the contract checks we publish: WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and WMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNUSDT0 and WMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WNUSDT0 at +0.33% and WMON at +3.79%.
More comparisons
WNUSDT0 vs RYYWNUSDT0 vs FKBWNUSDT0 vs CRDWNUSDT0 vs RDKWMON vs RYYWMON vs FKBWMON vs CRDWMON vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.