HostWNUSDT0 vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
WNUSDT0 (Monad) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WNUSDT0 vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WNUSDT0 | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.02 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $613.61K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $1.35M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 190 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~1,473× the liquidity of WNUSDT0
- CRD measures ~6,564× the 24h volume of WNUSDT0
What the data says
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNUSDT0 or CRD?
By tracked market cap: WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNUSDT0 or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNUSDT0 and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WNUSDT0 at +0.33% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WNUSDT0 vs RYYWNUSDT0 vs FKBWNUSDT0 vs RDKWNUSDT0 vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.