HostWNUSDT0 vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
WNUSDT0 (Monad) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WNUSDT0 vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WNUSDT0 | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.02 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $613.61K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $1.35M | $2.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 190 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~1,622× the liquidity of WNUSDT0
- FKB measures ~3,986× the 24h volume of WNUSDT0
What the data says
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNUSDT0 or FKB?
By tracked market cap: WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures — and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNUSDT0 or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNUSDT0 and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WNUSDT0 at +0.33% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WNUSDT0 vs RYYWNUSDT0 vs CRDWNUSDT0 vs RDKWNUSDT0 vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.