HostWMON vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
WMON (Monad) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WMON vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WMON | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02231 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.00M | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $1.19M | $2.26B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 296 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~1,891× the liquidity of WMON
- RYY measures ~3,472× the 24h volume of WMON
What the data says
WMON
WMON is wrapped MON — the ERC-20 form of Monad's native token that pools and routers actually compose, the same pattern as WETH on every other chain. The deployment 0x3bd359c1119da7da1d913d1c4d2b7c461115433a is Monad's canonical wrapper; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest wrapper note: WMON is mechanically the simplest claim in this index — a 1:1 deposit receipt for native MON issued by the canonical wrapper contract, with no custody between the holder and the asset beyond the wrapper contract itself. The asset's value is Monad's adoption; the wrapper is just plumbing.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WMON or RYY?
By tracked market cap: WMON (Monad) measures — and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WMON or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: WMON (Monad) grades B and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WMON and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WMON at +3.79% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WMON vs FKBWMON vs CRDWMON vs RDKWMON vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.