HostWNUSDT0 vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
WNUSDT0 (Monad) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WNUSDT0 vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WNUSDT0 | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.02 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $613.61K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $1.35M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 190 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~1,293× the liquidity of WNUSDT0
- RDK measures ~4,704× the 24h volume of WNUSDT0
What the data says
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNUSDT0 or RDK?
By tracked market cap: WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNUSDT0 or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNUSDT0 and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WNUSDT0 at +0.33% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WNUSDT0 vs RYYWNUSDT0 vs FKBWNUSDT0 vs CRDWNUSDT0 vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.