HostWMON vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
WMON (Monad) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WMON vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WMON | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02231 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.00M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $1.19M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 296 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~1,460× the liquidity of WMON
- RDK measures ~2,883× the 24h volume of WMON
What the data says
WMON
WMON is wrapped MON — the ERC-20 form of Monad's native token that pools and routers actually compose, the same pattern as WETH on every other chain. The deployment 0x3bd359c1119da7da1d913d1c4d2b7c461115433a is Monad's canonical wrapper; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest wrapper note: WMON is mechanically the simplest claim in this index — a 1:1 deposit receipt for native MON issued by the canonical wrapper contract, with no custody between the holder and the asset beyond the wrapper contract itself. The asset's value is Monad's adoption; the wrapper is just plumbing.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WMON or RDK?
By tracked market cap: WMON (Monad) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WMON or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: WMON (Monad) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WMON and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WMON at +3.79% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WMON vs RYYWMON vs FKBWMON vs CRDWMON vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.