HostRNT vs WW3 — price, size and safety, side by side
RNT (Solana) vs WW3 (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
RNT vs WW3 — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| RNT | WW3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000984 | $0.003822 |
| Market cap | $927.53K | $3.66M |
| 24h volume | $9.71K | $809.24 |
| Liquidity | $193.60K | $195.83K |
| FDV | $927.53K | $3.66M |
| Holders | 16,201 | 4,444 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- WW3 measures ~3.9× the market cap of RNT
- RNT measures ~12× the 24h volume of WW3
- RNT measures ~3.6× the holder count of WW3
- over the shared window RNT moved −13.6% while WW3 moved +10.8%
What the data says
RNT
On the two things that matter most in a token contract, RNT looks great. The mint key is burned, so the supply is capped and stays that way, and freeze is gone as well, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts RNT at 92/100 as of the 2026-09-16 snapshot.
Market-wise, RNT carries workable liquidity of $193.60K and 16,201 wallets holding as of 2026-09-16. Encouragingly, that $193.60K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $927.53K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 16,201 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — 1.76% of supply as of 2026-09-16, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
WW3
WW3 — World War 3 — is a Solana headline meme trading on geopolitical-anxiety attention. The mint 7m2TUkpPZCScBhPJnGjWjbh75KkDNnwAdd7i74m8awad is what our scan tracks: $3.7 million market cap, $196 thousand of liquidity and 4,444 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read on news-cycle memes: they are attention futures — the price rises when the theme trends and has no floor when it does not. That makes them among the most purely reflexive assets in the corpus: the news is the product. The pool here is real; the holding period this token is built for is measured in news cycles, not quarters.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RNT or WW3?
By tracked market cap: RNT (Solana) measures $927.53K and WW3 (Solana) measures $3.66M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RNT or WW3?
On the contract checks we publish: RNT (Solana) grades A and WW3 (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RNT and WW3 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show RNT at −13.6% and WW3 at +10.8%.
More comparisons
RNT vs RYYRNT vs FKBRNT vs CRDRNT vs RDKWW3 vs RYYWW3 vs FKBWW3 vs CRDWW3 vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.