HostRNT vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
RNT (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
RNT vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| RNT | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000984 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $927.53K | — |
| 24h volume | $9.71K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $193.60K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $927.53K | — |
| Holders | 16,201 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~11,289× the liquidity of RNT
- FKB measures ~251,955× the 24h volume of RNT
- over the shared window RNT moved −13.6% while FKB moved 0.00%
What the data says
RNT
On the two things that matter most in a token contract, RNT looks great. The mint key is burned, so the supply is capped and stays that way, and freeze is gone as well, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts RNT at 92/100 as of the 2026-09-16 snapshot.
Market-wise, RNT carries workable liquidity of $193.60K and 16,201 wallets holding as of 2026-09-16. Encouragingly, that $193.60K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $927.53K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 16,201 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — 1.76% of supply as of 2026-09-16, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RNT or FKB?
By tracked market cap: RNT (Solana) measures $927.53K and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RNT or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: RNT (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RNT and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show RNT at −13.6% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
RNT vs RYYRNT vs CRDRNT vs RDKRNT vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.