HostWW3 vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
WW3 (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WW3 vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WW3 | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003821 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $3.66M | — |
| 24h volume | $809.24 | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $195.83K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $3.66M | — |
| Holders | 4,444 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~10,137× the liquidity of WW3
- CRD measures ~4,977,272× the 24h volume of WW3
- over the shared window WW3 moved +10.8% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
WW3
WW3 — World War 3 — is a Solana headline meme trading on geopolitical-anxiety attention. The mint 7m2TUkpPZCScBhPJnGjWjbh75KkDNnwAdd7i74m8awad is what our scan tracks: $3.7 million market cap, $196 thousand of liquidity and 4,444 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read on news-cycle memes: they are attention futures — the price rises when the theme trends and has no floor when it does not. That makes them among the most purely reflexive assets in the corpus: the news is the product. The pool here is real; the holding period this token is built for is measured in news cycles, not quarters.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WW3 or CRD?
By tracked market cap: WW3 (Solana) measures $3.66M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WW3 or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: WW3 (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WW3 and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WW3 at +10.8% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WW3 vs RYYWW3 vs FKBWW3 vs RDKWW3 vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.