HostWW3 vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
WW3 (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WW3 vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WW3 | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003821 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $3.66M | — |
| 24h volume | $809.24 | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $195.83K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $3.66M | — |
| Holders | 4,444 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~11,161× the liquidity of WW3
- FKB measures ~3,022,614× the 24h volume of WW3
- over the shared window WW3 moved +10.8% while FKB moved 0.00%
What the data says
WW3
WW3 — World War 3 — is a Solana headline meme trading on geopolitical-anxiety attention. The mint 7m2TUkpPZCScBhPJnGjWjbh75KkDNnwAdd7i74m8awad is what our scan tracks: $3.7 million market cap, $196 thousand of liquidity and 4,444 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read on news-cycle memes: they are attention futures — the price rises when the theme trends and has no floor when it does not. That makes them among the most purely reflexive assets in the corpus: the news is the product. The pool here is real; the holding period this token is built for is measured in news cycles, not quarters.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WW3 or FKB?
By tracked market cap: WW3 (Solana) measures $3.66M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WW3 or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: WW3 (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WW3 and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WW3 at +10.8% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WW3 vs RYYWW3 vs CRDWW3 vs RDKWW3 vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.