HostRNT vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
RNT (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
RNT vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| RNT | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000984 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $927.53K | — |
| 24h volume | $9.71K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $193.60K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $927.53K | — |
| Holders | 16,201 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~10,254× the liquidity of RNT
- CRD measures ~414,888× the 24h volume of RNT
- over the shared window RNT moved −13.6% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
RNT
On the two things that matter most in a token contract, RNT looks great. The mint key is burned, so the supply is capped and stays that way, and freeze is gone as well, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts RNT at 92/100 as of the 2026-09-16 snapshot.
Market-wise, RNT carries workable liquidity of $193.60K and 16,201 wallets holding as of 2026-09-16. Encouragingly, that $193.60K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $927.53K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 16,201 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — 1.76% of supply as of 2026-09-16, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RNT or CRD?
By tracked market cap: RNT (Solana) measures $927.53K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RNT or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: RNT (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RNT and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show RNT at −13.6% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
RNT vs RYYRNT vs FKBRNT vs RDKRNT vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.