HostEAT vs GRUMPY — price, size and safety, side by side
EAT (Solana) vs GRUMPY (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
EAT vs GRUMPY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| EAT | GRUMPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003472 | $0.00002037 |
| Market cap | $3.54M | $183.75K |
| 24h volume | $3.69K | $674.49 |
| Liquidity | $23.48K | $23.83K |
| FDV | $3.54M | $183.75K |
| Holders | 15,455 | 78,135 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- EAT measures ~19× the market cap of GRUMPY
- EAT measures ~5.5× the 24h volume of GRUMPY
- GRUMPY measures ~5.1× the holder count of EAT
- over the shared window EAT moved −15.2% while GRUMPY moved −20.4%
What the data says
EAT
EAT is the token of 375ai — a Solana DePIN project running edge devices that collect real-world data (traffic, environment) for sale to AI and mapping consumers. The mint 375aiUqZERLrB9sHtsArKr4nuWCgBrtqibUDBMGeLvZC is what our scan tracks: $3.5 million market cap, $23 thousand of liquidity and 15,455 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest DePIN ledger: the contributor network is real — fifteen thousand holders reads as device operators, not just traders — and data-for-AI is a genuine demand thesis. The caution is the same one every DePIN carries: emissions pay contributors before customer revenue matures, so the token front-runs its business. Pool depth is thin for the cap; that is the practical figure.
GRUMPY
GRUMPY — Grumpy Cat — occupies the long tail of Solana's cat-meme canon: roughly $184 thousand of market capitalization in the September 16, 2026 snapshot, held across 78,135 wallets, on mint GRUmPYbiTpq9ZPy5LAqBMMze7kErf5dEX2i9qYfwoSmR. Seventy-eight thousand holders on a six-figure cap is the shape of a token whose big moment came and went, leaving the wallets as the record.
The contract closed out the way a memecoin should: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, creator-associated wallet under 0.01% of supply — all confirmed in the snapshot. GRUMPY deflated on attention, not on any of the extraction mechanics this scanner exists to catch; there is a real difference between a faded token and a rugged one, and this is the former.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EAT or GRUMPY?
By tracked market cap: EAT (Solana) measures $3.54M and GRUMPY (Solana) measures $183.75K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EAT or GRUMPY?
On the contract checks we publish: EAT (Solana) grades A and GRUMPY (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EAT and GRUMPY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show EAT at −15.2% and GRUMPY at −20.4%.
More comparisons
EAT vs RYYEAT vs FKBEAT vs CRDEAT vs RDKGRUMPY vs RYYGRUMPY vs FKBGRUMPY vs CRDGRUMPY vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.