HostGRUMPY vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
GRUMPY (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GRUMPY vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GRUMPY | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00002037 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $183.75K | — |
| 24h volume | $674.49 | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $23.83K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $183.75K | — |
| Holders | 78,135 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~83,300× the liquidity of GRUMPY
- CRD measures ~5,971,639× the 24h volume of GRUMPY
- over the shared window GRUMPY moved −20.4% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
GRUMPY
GRUMPY — Grumpy Cat — occupies the long tail of Solana's cat-meme canon: roughly $184 thousand of market capitalization in the September 16, 2026 snapshot, held across 78,135 wallets, on mint GRUmPYbiTpq9ZPy5LAqBMMze7kErf5dEX2i9qYfwoSmR. Seventy-eight thousand holders on a six-figure cap is the shape of a token whose big moment came and went, leaving the wallets as the record.
The contract closed out the way a memecoin should: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, creator-associated wallet under 0.01% of supply — all confirmed in the snapshot. GRUMPY deflated on attention, not on any of the extraction mechanics this scanner exists to catch; there is a real difference between a faded token and a rugged one, and this is the former.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GRUMPY or CRD?
By tracked market cap: GRUMPY (Solana) measures $183.75K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GRUMPY or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: GRUMPY (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GRUMPY and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GRUMPY at −20.4% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GRUMPY vs RYYGRUMPY vs FKBGRUMPY vs RDKGRUMPY vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.