HostEAT vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
EAT (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
EAT vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| EAT | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003472 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $3.54M | — |
| 24h volume | $3.69K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $23.48K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $3.54M | — |
| Holders | 15,455 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~74,225× the liquidity of EAT
- RDK measures ~781,594× the 24h volume of EAT
- over the shared window EAT moved −15.2% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
EAT
EAT is the token of 375ai — a Solana DePIN project running edge devices that collect real-world data (traffic, environment) for sale to AI and mapping consumers. The mint 375aiUqZERLrB9sHtsArKr4nuWCgBrtqibUDBMGeLvZC is what our scan tracks: $3.5 million market cap, $23 thousand of liquidity and 15,455 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest DePIN ledger: the contributor network is real — fifteen thousand holders reads as device operators, not just traders — and data-for-AI is a genuine demand thesis. The caution is the same one every DePIN carries: emissions pay contributors before customer revenue matures, so the token front-runs its business. Pool depth is thin for the cap; that is the practical figure.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EAT or RDK?
By tracked market cap: EAT (Solana) measures $3.54M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EAT or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: EAT (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EAT and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show EAT at −15.2% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
EAT vs RYYEAT vs FKBEAT vs CRDEAT vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.