HostGRUMPY vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
GRUMPY (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GRUMPY vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GRUMPY | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00002037 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $183.75K | — |
| 24h volume | $674.49 | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $23.83K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $183.75K | — |
| Holders | 78,135 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~73,133× the liquidity of GRUMPY
- RDK measures ~4,279,503× the 24h volume of GRUMPY
- over the shared window GRUMPY moved −20.4% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
GRUMPY
GRUMPY — Grumpy Cat — occupies the long tail of Solana's cat-meme canon: roughly $184 thousand of market capitalization in the September 16, 2026 snapshot, held across 78,135 wallets, on mint GRUmPYbiTpq9ZPy5LAqBMMze7kErf5dEX2i9qYfwoSmR. Seventy-eight thousand holders on a six-figure cap is the shape of a token whose big moment came and went, leaving the wallets as the record.
The contract closed out the way a memecoin should: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, creator-associated wallet under 0.01% of supply — all confirmed in the snapshot. GRUMPY deflated on attention, not on any of the extraction mechanics this scanner exists to catch; there is a real difference between a faded token and a rugged one, and this is the former.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GRUMPY or RDK?
By tracked market cap: GRUMPY (Solana) measures $183.75K and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GRUMPY or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: GRUMPY (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GRUMPY and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GRUMPY at −20.4% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GRUMPY vs RYYGRUMPY vs FKBGRUMPY vs CRDGRUMPY vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.