HostEAT vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
EAT (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
EAT vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| EAT | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003472 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $3.54M | — |
| 24h volume | $3.69K | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $23.48K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $3.54M | — |
| Holders | 15,455 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~96,114× the liquidity of EAT
- RYY measures ~941,275× the 24h volume of EAT
- over the shared window EAT moved −15.2% while RYY moved 0.00%
What the data says
EAT
EAT is the token of 375ai — a Solana DePIN project running edge devices that collect real-world data (traffic, environment) for sale to AI and mapping consumers. The mint 375aiUqZERLrB9sHtsArKr4nuWCgBrtqibUDBMGeLvZC is what our scan tracks: $3.5 million market cap, $23 thousand of liquidity and 15,455 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest DePIN ledger: the contributor network is real — fifteen thousand holders reads as device operators, not just traders — and data-for-AI is a genuine demand thesis. The caution is the same one every DePIN carries: emissions pay contributors before customer revenue matures, so the token front-runs its business. Pool depth is thin for the cap; that is the practical figure.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EAT or RYY?
By tracked market cap: EAT (Solana) measures $3.54M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EAT or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: EAT (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EAT and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show EAT at −15.2% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
EAT vs FKBEAT vs CRDEAT vs RDKEAT vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.