HostWYLDS vs IOT — price, size and safety, side by side
WYLDS (Solana) vs IOT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
WYLDS vs IOT — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WYLDS | IOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9946 | $0.00006975 |
| Market cap | $140.28M | $917.30K |
| 24h volume | $0.078 | $382.15 |
| Liquidity | $204.53 | $307.32 |
| FDV | $140.28M | $917.30K |
| Holders | 353 | 132,324 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- WYLDS measures ~153× the market cap of IOT
- IOT measures ~1.5× the liquidity of WYLDS
- IOT measures ~4,899× the 24h volume of WYLDS
- IOT measures ~375× the holder count of WYLDS
- over the shared window WYLDS moved −0.04% while IOT moved −19.3%
What the data says
WYLDS
WYLDS — wYLDS — is a wrapped yield-bearing token on Solana whose printed cap badly outruns its market. The mint 8fr7WGTVFszfyNWRMXj6fRjZZAnDwmXwEpCrtzmUkdih is what our scan tracks: $140.3 million market cap on $205 of pool liquidity with 353 holders as of September 16, 2026.
That is the most extreme cap-to-door ratio in this batch: two hundred dollars of pool under a hundred-forty-million cap. Wrapped yield tokens often route most of their supply through the issuer's own mint-and-redeem path rather than through public pools — which would explain rather than excuse the figure — but either way, a public exit priced through this pool is not available at the printed valuation. Treat the cap as arithmetic.
IOT
IOT is the Helium network's IOT-subnetwork token — earned by the LoRaWAN hotspot operators who built out Helium's original sensor network, under the subDAO structure Helium adopted after migrating to Solana in 2023. The September 16, 2026 snapshot records roughly $917 thousand of market capitalization spread across 132,324 holders on mint iotEVVZLEywoTn1QdwNPddxPWszn3zFhEot3MfL9fns — a holder base built by mining rewards, one hotspot at a time, which is why it is so wide relative to the value.
Both authority checks pass in the snapshot: mint revoked, freeze revoked. Nothing in the token's SPL-level configuration can dilute a balance or freeze one, and that is what the 85/100 certifies on the structure side.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WYLDS or IOT?
By tracked market cap: WYLDS (Solana) measures $140.28M and IOT (Solana) measures $917.30K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WYLDS or IOT?
On the contract checks we publish: WYLDS (Solana) grades B and IOT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WYLDS and IOT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WYLDS at −0.04% and IOT at −19.3%.
More comparisons
WYLDS vs RYYWYLDS vs FKBWYLDS vs CRDWYLDS vs RDKIOT vs RYYIOT vs FKBIOT vs CRDIOT vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.