HostIOT vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
IOT (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
IOT vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| IOT | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00006975 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $917.30K | — |
| 24h volume | $382.15 | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $307.32 | $1.74B |
| FDV | $917.30K | — |
| Holders | 132,324 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~5,670,932× the liquidity of IOT
- RDK measures ~7,553,202× the 24h volume of IOT
- over the shared window IOT moved −19.3% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
IOT
IOT is the Helium network's IOT-subnetwork token — earned by the LoRaWAN hotspot operators who built out Helium's original sensor network, under the subDAO structure Helium adopted after migrating to Solana in 2023. The September 16, 2026 snapshot records roughly $917 thousand of market capitalization spread across 132,324 holders on mint iotEVVZLEywoTn1QdwNPddxPWszn3zFhEot3MfL9fns — a holder base built by mining rewards, one hotspot at a time, which is why it is so wide relative to the value.
Both authority checks pass in the snapshot: mint revoked, freeze revoked. Nothing in the token's SPL-level configuration can dilute a balance or freeze one, and that is what the 85/100 certifies on the structure side.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IOT or RDK?
By tracked market cap: IOT (Solana) measures $917.30K and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IOT or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: IOT (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IOT and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show IOT at −19.3% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
IOT vs RYYIOT vs FKBIOT vs CRDIOT vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.