Open app

WYLDS vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side

WYLDS (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

WYLDSB

$0.9946
wYLDS on Solana
Trade WYLDS
vs

RYYB

$1.08
Reyayu on Base
Trade RYY

WYLDS vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
WYLDS −0.04%  ·  RYY 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
WYLDSRYY
Price$0.9946$1.08
Market cap$140.28M
24h volume$0.078$3.48B
Liquidity$204.53$2.26B
FDV$140.28M
Holders353
Age (days)1
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

WYLDS

WYLDS — wYLDS — is a wrapped yield-bearing token on Solana whose printed cap badly outruns its market. The mint 8fr7WGTVFszfyNWRMXj6fRjZZAnDwmXwEpCrtzmUkdih is what our scan tracks: $140.3 million market cap on $205 of pool liquidity with 353 holders as of September 16, 2026.

That is the most extreme cap-to-door ratio in this batch: two hundred dollars of pool under a hundred-forty-million cap. Wrapped yield tokens often route most of their supply through the issuer's own mint-and-redeem path rather than through public pools — which would explain rather than excuse the figure — but either way, a public exit priced through this pool is not available at the printed valuation. Treat the cap as arithmetic.

Full WYLDS safety read →

RYY

The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.

Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.

Full RYY safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, WYLDS or RYY?

By tracked market cap: WYLDS (Solana) measures $140.28M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, WYLDS or RYY?

On the contract checks we publish: WYLDS (Solana) grades B and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have WYLDS and RYY performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WYLDS at −0.04% and RYY at 0.00%.

More comparisons

WYLDS vs FKBWYLDS vs CRDWYLDS vs RDKWYLDS vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.