HostWYLDS vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
WYLDS (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WYLDS vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WYLDS | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9946 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $140.28M | — |
| 24h volume | $0.078 | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $204.53 | $1.74B |
| FDV | $140.28M | — |
| Holders | 353 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~8,521,187× the liquidity of WYLDS
- RDK measures ~37,005,338,040× the 24h volume of WYLDS
What the data says
WYLDS
WYLDS — wYLDS — is a wrapped yield-bearing token on Solana whose printed cap badly outruns its market. The mint 8fr7WGTVFszfyNWRMXj6fRjZZAnDwmXwEpCrtzmUkdih is what our scan tracks: $140.3 million market cap on $205 of pool liquidity with 353 holders as of September 16, 2026.
That is the most extreme cap-to-door ratio in this batch: two hundred dollars of pool under a hundred-forty-million cap. Wrapped yield tokens often route most of their supply through the issuer's own mint-and-redeem path rather than through public pools — which would explain rather than excuse the figure — but either way, a public exit priced through this pool is not available at the printed valuation. Treat the cap as arithmetic.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WYLDS or RDK?
By tracked market cap: WYLDS (Solana) measures $140.28M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WYLDS or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: WYLDS (Solana) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WYLDS and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WYLDS at −0.04% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WYLDS vs RYYWYLDS vs FKBWYLDS vs CRDWYLDS vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.