HostWNUSDT0 vs WBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
WNUSDT0 (Monad) vs WBTC (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WNUSDT0 vs WBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WNUSDT0 | WBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.02 | $75.75K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $613.61K | $32.90M |
| Liquidity | $1.35M | $35.34M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 190 | 1,682 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~26× the liquidity of WNUSDT0
- WBTC measures ~54× the 24h volume of WNUSDT0
What the data says
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
WBTC
WBTC on Arbitrum is the same BitGo-custodied claim as its Ethereum parent, deployed at the canonical L2 address 0x2f2a2543b76a4166549f7aab2e75bef0aefc5b0f. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $35.3 million of tracked pool liquidity — the standard wrapped-Bitcoin venue for Arbitrum DeFi.
What a chain hop does and doesn't change: the custody question (BitGo, KYC'd merchants, the mint/burn pipeline) is identical to mainnet WBTC — the L2 deployment is a claim on the same reserve. What does change is the routing surface: L2 liquidity concentrates in fewer pools, so depth reads lower while redemption still routes through the same custodial spine.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNUSDT0 or WBTC?
By tracked market cap: WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures — and WBTC (Arbitrum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNUSDT0 or WBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and WBTC (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNUSDT0 and WBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WNUSDT0 at +0.33% and WBTC at +0.31%.
More comparisons
WNUSDT0 vs RYYWNUSDT0 vs FKBWNUSDT0 vs CRDWNUSDT0 vs RDKWBTC vs RYYWBTC vs FKBWBTC vs CRDWBTC vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.