HostWNUSDT0 vs MON — price, size and safety, side by side
WNUSDT0 (Monad) vs MON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WNUSDT0 vs MON — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WNUSDT0 | MON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.02 | $0.02228 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $613.61K | $1.81M |
| Liquidity | $1.35M | $1.25M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 190 | 300 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- MON measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of WNUSDT0
What the data says
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
MON
This row tracks MON — Monad's native token — under the all-zeroes placeholder 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 that DEX data uses for a chain's native asset. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.2 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest definitional note is the same as on ethereum and arbitrum: MON is the chain's native asset, so there is no mint contract to audit — the checks on this page describe the pools it trades against, not the token. What MON is worth is a question about whether Monad's parallel-EVM thesis (Solana-class speed on EVM semantics) wins real orderflow — the row measures the pools, not the thesis.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNUSDT0 or MON?
By tracked market cap: WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures — and MON (Monad) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNUSDT0 or MON?
On the contract checks we publish: WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and MON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNUSDT0 and MON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WNUSDT0 at +0.33% and MON at +3.87%.
More comparisons
WNUSDT0 vs RYYWNUSDT0 vs FKBWNUSDT0 vs CRDWNUSDT0 vs RDKMON vs RYYMON vs FKBMON vs CRDMON vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.