HostWLFI vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
WLFI (Solana) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WLFI vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WLFI | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05824 | $6.36 |
| Market cap | $44.82M | — |
| 24h volume | $23.25K | $1.17M |
| Liquidity | $32.71K | $14.18M |
| FDV | $44.82M | — |
| Holders | 29,752 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1,720 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~434× the liquidity of WLFI
- UNI measures ~50× the 24h volume of WLFI
- over the shared window WLFI moved +4.38% while UNI moved −8.55%
What the data says
WLFI
WLFI is World Liberty Financial's token — the Trump-family-affiliated DeFi project that has raised and moved real capital, and whose governance-fight headlines are part of the asset's price whether you like that or not. The mint WLFinEv6ypjkczcS83FZqFpgFZYwQXutRbxGe7oC16g is what our scan tracks on Solana: $44.8 million market cap, $33 thousand of tracked pool liquidity, 29,752 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest shape: WLFI's price is inseparable from a political brand — the project's stablecoin (USD1, covered separately) and lending ambitions are real, and so is the headline risk in both directions. The token was originally sold as non-transferable governance; transferability arriving later means the holder list predates a true price discovery — treat early float dynamics accordingly.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $14.2 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLFI or UNI?
By tracked market cap: WLFI (Solana) measures $44.82M and UNI (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLFI or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: WLFI (Solana) grades A and UNI (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLFI and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WLFI at +4.38% and UNI at −8.55%.
More comparisons
WLFI vs RYYWLFI vs FKBWLFI vs CRDWLFI vs RDKUNI vs RYYUNI vs FKBUNI vs CRDUNI vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.