HostWLFI vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
WLFI (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WLFI vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WLFI | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05824 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $44.82M | — |
| 24h volume | $23.25K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $32.71K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $44.82M | — |
| Holders | 29,752 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~53,288× the liquidity of WLFI
- RDK measures ~124,162× the 24h volume of WLFI
What the data says
WLFI
WLFI is World Liberty Financial's token — the Trump-family-affiliated DeFi project that has raised and moved real capital, and whose governance-fight headlines are part of the asset's price whether you like that or not. The mint WLFinEv6ypjkczcS83FZqFpgFZYwQXutRbxGe7oC16g is what our scan tracks on Solana: $44.8 million market cap, $33 thousand of tracked pool liquidity, 29,752 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest shape: WLFI's price is inseparable from a political brand — the project's stablecoin (USD1, covered separately) and lending ambitions are real, and so is the headline risk in both directions. The token was originally sold as non-transferable governance; transferability arriving later means the holder list predates a true price discovery — treat early float dynamics accordingly.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLFI or RDK?
By tracked market cap: WLFI (Solana) measures $44.82M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLFI or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: WLFI (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLFI and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WLFI at +4.38% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WLFI vs RYYWLFI vs FKBWLFI vs CRDWLFI vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.