HostUNI vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
UNI vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| UNI | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.36 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.17M | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $14.18M | $2.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,720 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~154× the liquidity of UNI
- FKB measures ~2,085× the 24h volume of UNI
- over the shared window UNI moved −8.55% while FKB moved 0.00%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $14.2 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or FKB?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures — and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show UNI at −8.55% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UNI vs RYYUNI vs CRDUNI vs RDKUNI vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.