HostUNI vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
UNI vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| UNI | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.36 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.17M | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $14.18M | $2.26B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,720 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~159× the liquidity of UNI
- RYY measures ~2,963× the 24h volume of UNI
- over the shared window UNI moved −8.55% while RYY moved 0.00%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $14.2 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or RYY?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures — and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades B and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show UNI at −8.55% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UNI vs FKBUNI vs CRDUNI vs RDKUNI vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.