HostWET vs GLDX — price, size and safety, side by side
WET (Solana) vs GLDX (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
WET vs GLDX — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WET | GLDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05699 | $400.52 |
| Market cap | $12.80M | $46.36M |
| 24h volume | $18.81K | $3.37M |
| Liquidity | $476.60K | $479.55K |
| FDV | $55.64M | $46.36M |
| Holders | 5,392 | 22,927 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- GLDX measures ~3.6× the market cap of WET
- GLDX measures ~179× the 24h volume of WET
- GLDX measures ~4.3× the holder count of WET
- over the shared window WET moved −11.2% while GLDX moved −0.76%
What the data says
WET
WET is the token of HumidiFi, one of Solana's proprietary AMMs — the "dark pool" market makers that quote through aggregators like Jupiter rather than running public liquidity pools. Mint WETZjtprkDMCcUxPi9PfWnowMRZkiGGHDb9rABuRZ2U; the September 16, 2026 snapshot puts tracked liquidity near $477 thousand, market cap near $13 million, and holders around 5,392.
HumidiFi matters in Solana's market structure: prop AMMs quietly became a large share of executed DEX volume because they quote tighter than public pools, and HumidiFi is one of the largest. That makes WET one of the more unusual tokens on this site — a claim tied to a trading firm whose revenue you cannot fully observe on-chain, since the whole point of a prop AMM is that its inventory and strategy are private.
GLDX
GLDX is Backed Finance's gold-linked xStock — the same tokenization line as the equity names, but the claim underneath points at a gold instrument rather than a single company's shares. The mint Xsv9hRk1z5ystj9MhnA7Lq4vjSsLwzL2nxrwmwtD3re is what our scan tracks: $46.4 million market cap, $480 thousand of liquidity and 22,927 holders as of September 16, 2026 — one of the deepest pools and widest holder bases in the xStock family.
The honest shape differs from the equity siblings in one way that matters: the custody chain is a layer deeper — token, issuer structure, underlying fund, bullion claim — versus token, issuer, share. You are holding a claim on a claim on gold, plus Solana-side trading risk. People buy this leg as an on-chain store-of-value sleeve, not as an equity position, and the tracking read is against the gold price rather than a stock quote.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WET or GLDX?
By tracked market cap: WET (Solana) measures $12.80M and GLDX (Solana) measures $46.36M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WET or GLDX?
On the contract checks we publish: WET (Solana) grades A and GLDX (Solana) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WET and GLDX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WET at −11.2% and GLDX at −0.76%.
More comparisons
WET vs RYYWET vs FKBWET vs CRDWET vs RDKGLDX vs RYYGLDX vs FKBGLDX vs CRDGLDX vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.