HostGLDX vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
GLDX (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GLDX vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GLDX | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $400.52 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $46.36M | — |
| 24h volume | $3.37M | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $479.55K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $46.36M | — |
| Holders | 22,927 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~4,557× the liquidity of GLDX
- FKB measures ~727× the 24h volume of GLDX
What the data says
GLDX
GLDX is Backed Finance's gold-linked xStock — the same tokenization line as the equity names, but the claim underneath points at a gold instrument rather than a single company's shares. The mint Xsv9hRk1z5ystj9MhnA7Lq4vjSsLwzL2nxrwmwtD3re is what our scan tracks: $46.4 million market cap, $480 thousand of liquidity and 22,927 holders as of September 16, 2026 — one of the deepest pools and widest holder bases in the xStock family.
The honest shape differs from the equity siblings in one way that matters: the custody chain is a layer deeper — token, issuer structure, underlying fund, bullion claim — versus token, issuer, share. You are holding a claim on a claim on gold, plus Solana-side trading risk. People buy this leg as an on-chain store-of-value sleeve, not as an equity position, and the tracking read is against the gold price rather than a stock quote.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GLDX or FKB?
By tracked market cap: GLDX (Solana) measures $46.36M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GLDX or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: GLDX (Solana) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GLDX and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GLDX at −0.76% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GLDX vs RYYGLDX vs CRDGLDX vs RDKGLDX vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.