HostGLDX vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
GLDX (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GLDX vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GLDX | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $400.52 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $46.36M | — |
| 24h volume | $3.37M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $479.55K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $46.36M | — |
| Holders | 22,927 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~4,139× the liquidity of GLDX
- CRD measures ~1,197× the 24h volume of GLDX
What the data says
GLDX
GLDX is Backed Finance's gold-linked xStock — the same tokenization line as the equity names, but the claim underneath points at a gold instrument rather than a single company's shares. The mint Xsv9hRk1z5ystj9MhnA7Lq4vjSsLwzL2nxrwmwtD3re is what our scan tracks: $46.4 million market cap, $480 thousand of liquidity and 22,927 holders as of September 16, 2026 — one of the deepest pools and widest holder bases in the xStock family.
The honest shape differs from the equity siblings in one way that matters: the custody chain is a layer deeper — token, issuer structure, underlying fund, bullion claim — versus token, issuer, share. You are holding a claim on a claim on gold, plus Solana-side trading risk. People buy this leg as an on-chain store-of-value sleeve, not as an equity position, and the tracking read is against the gold price rather than a stock quote.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GLDX or CRD?
By tracked market cap: GLDX (Solana) measures $46.36M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GLDX or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: GLDX (Solana) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GLDX and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GLDX at −0.76% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GLDX vs RYYGLDX vs FKBGLDX vs RDKGLDX vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.