HostGLDX vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
GLDX (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GLDX vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GLDX | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $400.52 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $46.36M | — |
| 24h volume | $3.37M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $479.55K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $46.36M | — |
| Holders | 22,927 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~3,634× the liquidity of GLDX
- RDK measures ~857× the 24h volume of GLDX
What the data says
GLDX
GLDX is Backed Finance's gold-linked xStock — the same tokenization line as the equity names, but the claim underneath points at a gold instrument rather than a single company's shares. The mint Xsv9hRk1z5ystj9MhnA7Lq4vjSsLwzL2nxrwmwtD3re is what our scan tracks: $46.4 million market cap, $480 thousand of liquidity and 22,927 holders as of September 16, 2026 — one of the deepest pools and widest holder bases in the xStock family.
The honest shape differs from the equity siblings in one way that matters: the custody chain is a layer deeper — token, issuer structure, underlying fund, bullion claim — versus token, issuer, share. You are holding a claim on a claim on gold, plus Solana-side trading risk. People buy this leg as an on-chain store-of-value sleeve, not as an equity position, and the tracking read is against the gold price rather than a stock quote.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GLDX or RDK?
By tracked market cap: GLDX (Solana) measures $46.36M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GLDX or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: GLDX (Solana) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GLDX and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GLDX at −0.76% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GLDX vs RYYGLDX vs FKBGLDX vs CRDGLDX vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.