HostUNI vs CRVUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs CRVUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
UNI vs CRVUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| UNI | CRVUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.36 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.17M | $4.88M |
| Liquidity | $14.18M | $14.09M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,720 | 1,215 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRVUSD measures ~4.2× the 24h volume of UNI
- over the shared window UNI moved −8.55% while CRVUSD moved +0.14%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $14.2 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
CRVUSD
CRVUSD is Curve's own stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited into Curve's LLAMMA system, which liquidates gradually across a price band instead of in a single cliff, the design that made it the DeFi stable built for volatile collateral. The deployment 0xf939e0a03fb07f59a73314e73794be0e57ac1b4e is the Ethereum mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $14.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: LLAMMA's soft-liquidation is genuinely novel — collateral converts to crvUSD gradually as price falls, cushioning the cliff-edge failure mode other CDP systems have. The trade-off is that the peg's quality is a function of Curve's collateral book and liquidation engine rather than a fiat reserve — verifiable on-chain, never guaranteed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or CRVUSD?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures — and CRVUSD (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or CRVUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades B and CRVUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and CRVUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show UNI at −8.55% and CRVUSD at +0.14%.
More comparisons
UNI vs RYYUNI vs FKBUNI vs CRDUNI vs RDKCRVUSD vs RYYCRVUSD vs FKBCRVUSD vs CRDCRVUSD vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.