HostCRVUSD vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
CRVUSD (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
CRVUSD vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| CRVUSD | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $4.88M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $14.09M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,215 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~124× the liquidity of CRVUSD
- RDK measures ~592× the 24h volume of CRVUSD
What the data says
CRVUSD
CRVUSD is Curve's own stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited into Curve's LLAMMA system, which liquidates gradually across a price band instead of in a single cliff, the design that made it the DeFi stable built for volatile collateral. The deployment 0xf939e0a03fb07f59a73314e73794be0e57ac1b4e is the Ethereum mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $14.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: LLAMMA's soft-liquidation is genuinely novel — collateral converts to crvUSD gradually as price falls, cushioning the cliff-edge failure mode other CDP systems have. The trade-off is that the peg's quality is a function of Curve's collateral book and liquidation engine rather than a fiat reserve — verifiable on-chain, never guaranteed.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRVUSD or RDK?
By tracked market cap: CRVUSD (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRVUSD or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: CRVUSD (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRVUSD and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show CRVUSD at +0.14% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
CRVUSD vs RYYCRVUSD vs FKBCRVUSD vs CRDCRVUSD vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.