HostLIT vs SUSHI — price, size and safety, side by side
LIT (Ethereum) vs SUSHI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
LIT vs SUSHI — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| LIT | SUSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.49 | $0.2465 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $2.15M | $753.42K |
| Liquidity | $1.20M | $1.09M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 239 | 1,042 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- LIT measures ~2.9× the 24h volume of SUSHI
What the data says
LIT
LIT is Lighter's token — the equity of one of the higher-volume perpetual DEXes running, a zk-rollup venue that settles Ethereum-grade while quoting like a centralized exchange. The contract 0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2 is the deployment our scan tracks, at $1.2 million of pool liquidity as of September 14, 2026.
The honest read: the venue is real — Lighter has sat near the top of perp-DEX volume rankings — and the question is the standard one for fresh exchange tokens: how much of the venue's economics actually accrue to the token, and what the post-airdrop float looks like as unlocks land. Volume is the claim; the token's claim on it is what to verify.
SUSHI
SUSHI is SushiSwap's token — the exchange that famously vampire-attacked Uniswap's liquidity in 2020 and has run as a multichain DEX brand ever since. The contract 0x6b3595068778dd592e39a122f4f5a5cf09c90fe2 is the canonical mainnet deployment; our September 6, 2026 read shows $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.25 handle.
The honest read: SUSHI is a legacy-major trading a long way below its peak — the protocol still ships (aggregator routing, the v4 work, a broad chain footprint), and xSUSHI staking still routes a share of venue fees, but the token's valuation is a bet that a crowded DEX market leaves room for a fifth-generation contender. The brand is the asset and the ceiling.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LIT or SUSHI?
By tracked market cap: LIT (Ethereum) measures — and SUSHI (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LIT or SUSHI?
On the contract checks we publish: LIT (Ethereum) grades B and SUSHI (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LIT and SUSHI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show LIT at 0.00% and SUSHI at 0.00%.
More comparisons
LIT vs RYYLIT vs FKBLIT vs CRDLIT vs RDKSUSHI vs RYYSUSHI vs FKBSUSHI vs CRDSUSHI vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.