HostSUSHI vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSHI (Ethereum) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SUSHI vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-06 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SUSHI | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2465 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $753.42K | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $1.09M | $2.26B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,042 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~2,075× the liquidity of SUSHI
- RYY measures ~4,614× the 24h volume of SUSHI
What the data says
SUSHI
SUSHI is SushiSwap's token — the exchange that famously vampire-attacked Uniswap's liquidity in 2020 and has run as a multichain DEX brand ever since. The contract 0x6b3595068778dd592e39a122f4f5a5cf09c90fe2 is the canonical mainnet deployment; our September 6, 2026 read shows $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.25 handle.
The honest read: SUSHI is a legacy-major trading a long way below its peak — the protocol still ships (aggregator routing, the v4 work, a broad chain footprint), and xSUSHI staking still routes a share of venue fees, but the token's valuation is a bet that a crowded DEX market leaves room for a fifth-generation contender. The brand is the asset and the ceiling.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSHI or RYY?
By tracked market cap: SUSHI (Ethereum) measures — and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSHI or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSHI (Ethereum) grades B and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSHI and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-06 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SUSHI at 0.00% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SUSHI vs FKBSUSHI vs CRDSUSHI vs RDKSUSHI vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-06→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.