HostSUSHI vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSHI (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SUSHI vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-06 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SUSHI | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2465 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $753.42K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $1.09M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,042 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~1,825× the liquidity of SUSHI
- CRD measures ~5,346× the 24h volume of SUSHI
What the data says
SUSHI
SUSHI is SushiSwap's token — the exchange that famously vampire-attacked Uniswap's liquidity in 2020 and has run as a multichain DEX brand ever since. The contract 0x6b3595068778dd592e39a122f4f5a5cf09c90fe2 is the canonical mainnet deployment; our September 6, 2026 read shows $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.25 handle.
The honest read: SUSHI is a legacy-major trading a long way below its peak — the protocol still ships (aggregator routing, the v4 work, a broad chain footprint), and xSUSHI staking still routes a share of venue fees, but the token's valuation is a bet that a crowded DEX market leaves room for a fifth-generation contender. The brand is the asset and the ceiling.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSHI or CRD?
By tracked market cap: SUSHI (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSHI or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSHI (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSHI and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-06 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SUSHI at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SUSHI vs RYYSUSHI vs FKBSUSHI vs RDKSUSHI vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-06→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.