HostLIT vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
LIT (Ethereum) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
LIT vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| LIT | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.49 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $2.15M | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $1.20M | $2.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 239 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~1,820× the liquidity of LIT
- FKB measures ~1,139× the 24h volume of LIT
What the data says
LIT
LIT is Lighter's token — the equity of one of the higher-volume perpetual DEXes running, a zk-rollup venue that settles Ethereum-grade while quoting like a centralized exchange. The contract 0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2 is the deployment our scan tracks, at $1.2 million of pool liquidity as of September 14, 2026.
The honest read: the venue is real — Lighter has sat near the top of perp-DEX volume rankings — and the question is the standard one for fresh exchange tokens: how much of the venue's economics actually accrue to the token, and what the post-airdrop float looks like as unlocks land. Volume is the claim; the token's claim on it is what to verify.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LIT or FKB?
By tracked market cap: LIT (Ethereum) measures — and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LIT or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: LIT (Ethereum) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LIT and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show LIT at 0.00% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
LIT vs RYYLIT vs CRDLIT vs RDKLIT vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.