HostGP vs PYTH — price, size and safety, side by side
GP (Solana) vs PYTH (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
GP vs PYTH — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GP | PYTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3605 | $0.05574 |
| Market cap | $17.12M | $410.08M |
| 24h volume | $87.28K | $997.55K |
| Liquidity | $338.94K | $339.70K |
| FDV | $17.12M | $520.73M |
| Holders | 10,731 | 307,169 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PYTH measures ~24× the market cap of GP
- PYTH measures ~11× the 24h volume of GP
- PYTH measures ~29× the holder count of GP
- over the shared window GP moved +15.3% while PYTH moved +3.95%
What the data says
GP
GP is Graphite Protocol's ecosystem token on Solana — the utility asset of an infrastructure project building reputation and identity tooling for Solana applications. The mint 31k88G5Mq7ptbRDf3AM13HAq6wRQHXHikR8hik7wPygk is what our scan tracks: $17.1 million market cap, $339 thousand of liquidity and 10,731 holders as of September 16, 2026 — a grade-A row with an unusually healthy liquidity-to-cap ratio for this tier.
The honest read on a token like this is adoption math: its value case rests on whether Graphite's tooling sees sustained use across Solana apps, which is a slower-burn question than price action suggests. The holder base is broad and the pool is genuinely deep relative to supply — the figures describe a market that functions, which is more than most tokens this size can claim.
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the September 16, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $410.1 million of market capitalization across 307,169 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $340 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GP or PYTH?
By tracked market cap: GP (Solana) measures $17.12M and PYTH (Solana) measures $410.08M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GP or PYTH?
On the contract checks we publish: GP (Solana) grades A and PYTH (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GP and PYTH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GP at +15.3% and PYTH at +3.95%.
More comparisons
GP vs RYYGP vs FKBGP vs CRDGP vs RDKPYTH vs RYYPYTH vs FKBPYTH vs CRDPYTH vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.