HostGP vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
GP (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GP vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GP | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3605 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $17.12M | — |
| 24h volume | $87.28K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $338.94K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $17.12M | — |
| Holders | 10,731 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~5,142× the liquidity of GP
- RDK measures ~33,072× the 24h volume of GP
- over the shared window GP moved +15.3% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
GP
GP is Graphite Protocol's ecosystem token on Solana — the utility asset of an infrastructure project building reputation and identity tooling for Solana applications. The mint 31k88G5Mq7ptbRDf3AM13HAq6wRQHXHikR8hik7wPygk is what our scan tracks: $17.1 million market cap, $339 thousand of liquidity and 10,731 holders as of September 16, 2026 — a grade-A row with an unusually healthy liquidity-to-cap ratio for this tier.
The honest read on a token like this is adoption math: its value case rests on whether Graphite's tooling sees sustained use across Solana apps, which is a slower-burn question than price action suggests. The holder base is broad and the pool is genuinely deep relative to supply — the figures describe a market that functions, which is more than most tokens this size can claim.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GP or RDK?
By tracked market cap: GP (Solana) measures $17.12M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GP or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: GP (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GP and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GP at +15.3% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GP vs RYYGP vs FKBGP vs CRDGP vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.