HostPYTH vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
PYTH (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
PYTH vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| PYTH | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05626 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $410.08M | — |
| 24h volume | $997.55K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $339.70K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $520.73M | — |
| Holders | 307,169 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~5,130× the liquidity of PYTH
- RDK measures ~2,894× the 24h volume of PYTH
What the data says
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the September 16, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $410.1 million of market capitalization across 307,169 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $340 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PYTH or RDK?
By tracked market cap: PYTH (Solana) measures $410.08M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PYTH or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: PYTH (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PYTH and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show PYTH at +4.92% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PYTH vs RYYPYTH vs FKBPYTH vs CRDPYTH vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.