HostPYTH vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
PYTH (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
PYTH vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| PYTH | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05574 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $410.08M | — |
| 24h volume | $997.55K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $339.70K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $520.73M | — |
| Holders | 307,169 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~5,844× the liquidity of PYTH
- CRD measures ~4,038× the 24h volume of PYTH
What the data says
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the September 16, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $410.1 million of market capitalization across 307,169 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $340 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PYTH or CRD?
By tracked market cap: PYTH (Solana) measures $410.08M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PYTH or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: PYTH (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PYTH and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show PYTH at +3.95% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PYTH vs RYYPYTH vs FKBPYTH vs RDKPYTH vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.