HostGHIBLI vs EFFECT — price, size and safety, side by side
GHIBLI (Solana) vs EFFECT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
GHIBLI vs EFFECT — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GHIBLI | EFFECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001078 | $0.002851 |
| Market cap | $102.20K | $1.51M |
| 24h volume | $419.29 | $1.35K |
| Liquidity | $44.38K | $44.32K |
| FDV | $102.20K | $1.51M |
| Holders | 12,610 | 5,906 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- EFFECT measures ~15× the market cap of GHIBLI
- EFFECT measures ~3.2× the 24h volume of GHIBLI
- GHIBLI measures ~2.1× the holder count of EFFECT
- over the shared window GHIBLI moved −17.4% while EFFECT moved +0.25%
What the data says
GHIBLI
Ghiblification — GHIBLI — the token born from the March 2025 "Ghibli-style" AI-image trend that flooded social feeds — on Solana at mint 4TBi66vi32S7J8X1A6eWfaLHYmUXu7CStcEmsJQdpump. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $44 thousand of liquidity and roughly 12,610 holders.
Trend-born memes have a legible lifecycle: a cultural moment peaks, a coin launches into the peak, and the token's price becomes a derivative of whether the trend kept any cultural oxygen. GHIBLI survived its moment longer than most — the trend was genuinely enormous — but the honest label is event-meme economics.
EFFECT
Effect AI — EFFECT — one of crypto's oldest surviving tokens: the Effect Network's workforce/data-labeling platform token, launched as EFX on NEO in 2018, migrated to Solana, and still here. Vanity-ish mint EFFECT1A1R3Dz8Hg4q5SXKjkiPc6KDRUWQ7Czjvy4H7E; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $44 thousand of liquidity and roughly 5,906 holders.
Survival is the honest headline: an eight-year-old project that migrated chains, rebranded, and kept shipping microtask/data services is a different risk shape than a launch-coin — the team that didn't disappear is the strongest signal on the page, balanced against an economic model where the token's claim on platform activity has always been loose.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHIBLI or EFFECT?
By tracked market cap: GHIBLI (Solana) measures $102.20K and EFFECT (Solana) measures $1.51M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHIBLI or EFFECT?
On the contract checks we publish: GHIBLI (Solana) grades A and EFFECT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHIBLI and EFFECT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GHIBLI at −17.4% and EFFECT at +0.25%.
More comparisons
GHIBLI vs RYYGHIBLI vs FKBGHIBLI vs CRDGHIBLI vs RDKEFFECT vs RYYEFFECT vs FKBEFFECT vs CRDEFFECT vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.