HostEFFECT vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
EFFECT (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
EFFECT vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| EFFECT | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002851 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $1.51M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.35K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $44.32K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $1.51M | — |
| Holders | 5,906 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~39,325× the liquidity of EFFECT
- RDK measures ~2,131,655× the 24h volume of EFFECT
What the data says
EFFECT
Effect AI — EFFECT — one of crypto's oldest surviving tokens: the Effect Network's workforce/data-labeling platform token, launched as EFX on NEO in 2018, migrated to Solana, and still here. Vanity-ish mint EFFECT1A1R3Dz8Hg4q5SXKjkiPc6KDRUWQ7Czjvy4H7E; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $44 thousand of liquidity and roughly 5,906 holders.
Survival is the honest headline: an eight-year-old project that migrated chains, rebranded, and kept shipping microtask/data services is a different risk shape than a launch-coin — the team that didn't disappear is the strongest signal on the page, balanced against an economic model where the token's claim on platform activity has always been loose.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EFFECT or RDK?
By tracked market cap: EFFECT (Solana) measures $1.51M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EFFECT or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: EFFECT (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EFFECT and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show EFFECT at +0.25% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
EFFECT vs RYYEFFECT vs FKBEFFECT vs CRDEFFECT vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.