HostGHIBLI vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
GHIBLI (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GHIBLI vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GHIBLI | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001078 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $102.20K | — |
| 24h volume | $419.29 | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $44.38K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $102.20K | — |
| Holders | 12,610 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~44,728× the liquidity of GHIBLI
- CRD measures ~9,606,336× the 24h volume of GHIBLI
- over the shared window GHIBLI moved −17.4% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
GHIBLI
Ghiblification — GHIBLI — the token born from the March 2025 "Ghibli-style" AI-image trend that flooded social feeds — on Solana at mint 4TBi66vi32S7J8X1A6eWfaLHYmUXu7CStcEmsJQdpump. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $44 thousand of liquidity and roughly 12,610 holders.
Trend-born memes have a legible lifecycle: a cultural moment peaks, a coin launches into the peak, and the token's price becomes a derivative of whether the trend kept any cultural oxygen. GHIBLI survived its moment longer than most — the trend was genuinely enormous — but the honest label is event-meme economics.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHIBLI or CRD?
By tracked market cap: GHIBLI (Solana) measures $102.20K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHIBLI or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: GHIBLI (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHIBLI and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GHIBLI at −17.4% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GHIBLI vs RYYGHIBLI vs FKBGHIBLI vs RDKGHIBLI vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.