HostEFFECT vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
EFFECT (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
EFFECT vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| EFFECT | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002851 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $1.51M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.35K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $44.32K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $1.51M | — |
| Holders | 5,906 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~44,793× the liquidity of EFFECT
- CRD measures ~2,974,521× the 24h volume of EFFECT
What the data says
EFFECT
Effect AI — EFFECT — one of crypto's oldest surviving tokens: the Effect Network's workforce/data-labeling platform token, launched as EFX on NEO in 2018, migrated to Solana, and still here. Vanity-ish mint EFFECT1A1R3Dz8Hg4q5SXKjkiPc6KDRUWQ7Czjvy4H7E; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $44 thousand of liquidity and roughly 5,906 holders.
Survival is the honest headline: an eight-year-old project that migrated chains, rebranded, and kept shipping microtask/data services is a different risk shape than a launch-coin — the team that didn't disappear is the strongest signal on the page, balanced against an economic model where the token's claim on platform activity has always been loose.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EFFECT or CRD?
By tracked market cap: EFFECT (Solana) measures $1.51M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EFFECT or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: EFFECT (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EFFECT and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show EFFECT at +0.25% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
EFFECT vs RYYEFFECT vs FKBEFFECT vs RDKEFFECT vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.