Host67 vs SLIM — price, size and safety, side by side
67 (Solana) vs SLIM (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
67 vs SLIM — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| 67 | SLIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001509 | $0.004136 |
| Market cap | $1.65M | $395.04K |
| 24h volume | $56.95K | $149.60 |
| Liquidity | $167.74K | $167.46K |
| FDV | $1.65M | $395.04K |
| Holders | 18,479 | 405,877 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- 67 measures ~4.2× the market cap of SLIM
- 67 measures ~381× the 24h volume of SLIM
- SLIM measures ~22× the holder count of 67
- over the shared window 67 moved −30.8% while SLIM moved −13.7%
What the data says
67
67 starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The mint key is burned, so the supply is capped and stays that way, and freeze has been renounced as well, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Both powers being renounced is the main reason 67's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-16).
By the numbers, 67 is showing $167.74K of on-chain liquidity and 18,479 holders as of 2026-09-16. The $167.74K pool stands up well to a ~$1.65M cap — depth like that means 67 absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 18,479-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
SLIM
SLIM is a fossil from Solana's first mania, still breathing. Solanium was one of 2021's hot IDO launchpads — the venues that sold allocations in new projects to token-holding members — and SLIM, at mint xxxxa1sKNGwFtw2kFn8XauW9xq8hBZ5kVtcSesTT9fW, was the key that unlocked participation tiers. The launchpad era faded; the holder base it minted did not. As of HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot: 405,877 wallets still hold SLIM, against a market capitalization of roughly $395 thousand. Read that pair again — nearly half a million holders, less than half a million dollars of total value. The average position is worth about a dollar.
Structurally, there's nothing wrong with it, which is its own kind of interesting: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, about $167 thousand of pool liquidity that is actually large relative to the microscopic mcap. Nobody can inflate it, nobody can freeze you, and the exits — for positions this small — clear fine. The checks a scam fails, SLIM passes; it simply also demonstrates that passing them guarantees nothing about value.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 67 or SLIM?
By tracked market cap: 67 (Solana) measures $1.65M and SLIM (Solana) measures $395.04K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 67 or SLIM?
On the contract checks we publish: 67 (Solana) grades A and SLIM (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 67 and SLIM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show 67 at −30.8% and SLIM at −13.7%.
More comparisons
67 vs RYY67 vs FKB67 vs CRD67 vs RDKSLIM vs RYYSLIM vs FKBSLIM vs CRDSLIM vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.