HostSLIM vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
SLIM (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SLIM vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SLIM | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004136 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $395.04K | — |
| 24h volume | $149.60 | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $167.46K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $395.04K | — |
| Holders | 405,877 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~13,476× the liquidity of SLIM
- RYY measures ~23,236,737× the 24h volume of SLIM
- over the shared window SLIM moved −13.7% while RYY moved 0.00%
What the data says
SLIM
SLIM is a fossil from Solana's first mania, still breathing. Solanium was one of 2021's hot IDO launchpads — the venues that sold allocations in new projects to token-holding members — and SLIM, at mint xxxxa1sKNGwFtw2kFn8XauW9xq8hBZ5kVtcSesTT9fW, was the key that unlocked participation tiers. The launchpad era faded; the holder base it minted did not. As of HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot: 405,877 wallets still hold SLIM, against a market capitalization of roughly $395 thousand. Read that pair again — nearly half a million holders, less than half a million dollars of total value. The average position is worth about a dollar.
Structurally, there's nothing wrong with it, which is its own kind of interesting: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, about $167 thousand of pool liquidity that is actually large relative to the microscopic mcap. Nobody can inflate it, nobody can freeze you, and the exits — for positions this small — clear fine. The checks a scam fails, SLIM passes; it simply also demonstrates that passing them guarantees nothing about value.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SLIM or RYY?
By tracked market cap: SLIM (Solana) measures $395.04K and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SLIM or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: SLIM (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SLIM and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SLIM at −13.7% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SLIM vs FKBSLIM vs CRDSLIM vs RDKSLIM vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.