Host67 vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
67 (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
67 vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| 67 | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001509 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $1.65M | — |
| 24h volume | $56.95K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $167.74K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $1.65M | — |
| Holders | 18,479 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~13,030× the liquidity of 67
- FKB measures ~42,948× the 24h volume of 67
- over the shared window 67 moved −30.8% while FKB moved 0.00%
What the data says
67
67 starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The mint key is burned, so the supply is capped and stays that way, and freeze has been renounced as well, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Both powers being renounced is the main reason 67's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-16).
By the numbers, 67 is showing $167.74K of on-chain liquidity and 18,479 holders as of 2026-09-16. The $167.74K pool stands up well to a ~$1.65M cap — depth like that means 67 absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 18,479-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 67 or FKB?
By tracked market cap: 67 (Solana) measures $1.65M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 67 or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: 67 (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 67 and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show 67 at −30.8% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
67 vs RYY67 vs CRD67 vs RDK67 vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.