Host67 vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
67 (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
67 vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| 67 | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001509 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $1.65M | — |
| 24h volume | $56.95K | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $167.74K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $1.65M | — |
| Holders | 18,479 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~13,454× the liquidity of 67
- RYY measures ~61,037× the 24h volume of 67
- over the shared window 67 moved −30.8% while RYY moved 0.00%
What the data says
67
67 starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The mint key is burned, so the supply is capped and stays that way, and freeze has been renounced as well, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Both powers being renounced is the main reason 67's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-16).
By the numbers, 67 is showing $167.74K of on-chain liquidity and 18,479 holders as of 2026-09-16. The $167.74K pool stands up well to a ~$1.65M cap — depth like that means 67 absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 18,479-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 67 or RYY?
By tracked market cap: 67 (Solana) measures $1.65M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 67 or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: 67 (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 67 and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show 67 at −30.8% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
67 vs FKB67 vs CRD67 vs RDK67 vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.