HostXAUT0 vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
XAUT0 (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
XAUT0 vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| XAUT0 | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.37K | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $9.30M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.08M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $420.48K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $9.30M | — |
| Holders | 5,996 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~4,145× the liquidity of XAUT0
- RDK measures ~2,677× the 24h volume of XAUT0
What the data says
XAUT0
XAUT0 is the omnichain version of Tether Gold — XAUT bridged onto Solana through the OFT standard so one token represents a claim on a London-vaulted gold ounce. The mint AymATz4TCL9sWNEEV9Kvyz45CHVhDZ6kUgjTJPzLpU9P is what our scan tracks: $9.3 million market cap, $420 thousand of liquidity and 5,996 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The custody stack is the honest part: token, bridge representation, Tether's issuance, vaulted gold — four layers between you and metal. That is standard for tokenized commodities, and Tether Gold is the incumbent of the category, but it means the claim's quality depends on the issuer's attestations and the bridge's security alike. Priced near spot gold, the premium-or-discount to XAU is the figure to watch.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, XAUT0 or RDK?
By tracked market cap: XAUT0 (Solana) measures $9.30M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, XAUT0 or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: XAUT0 (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have XAUT0 and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show XAUT0 at −0.76% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
XAUT0 vs RYYXAUT0 vs FKBXAUT0 vs CRDXAUT0 vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.