Open app

XAUT0 vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side

XAUT0 (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

XAUT0A

$4.37K
Tether Gold on Solana
Trade XAUT0
vs

CRDB

$2.13K
Cirudu on Base
Trade CRD

XAUT0 vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
XAUT0 −0.76%  ·  CRD 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
XAUT0CRD
Price$4.37K$2.13K
Market cap$9.30M
24h volume$1.08M$4.03B
Liquidity$420.48K$1.99B
FDV$9.30M
Holders5,996
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

XAUT0

XAUT0 is the omnichain version of Tether Gold — XAUT bridged onto Solana through the OFT standard so one token represents a claim on a London-vaulted gold ounce. The mint AymATz4TCL9sWNEEV9Kvyz45CHVhDZ6kUgjTJPzLpU9P is what our scan tracks: $9.3 million market cap, $420 thousand of liquidity and 5,996 holders as of September 16, 2026.

The custody stack is the honest part: token, bridge representation, Tether's issuance, vaulted gold — four layers between you and metal. That is standard for tokenized commodities, and Tether Gold is the incumbent of the category, but it means the claim's quality depends on the issuer's attestations and the bridge's security alike. Priced near spot gold, the premium-or-discount to XAU is the figure to watch.

Full XAUT0 safety read →

CRD

Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.

This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.

Full CRD safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, XAUT0 or CRD?

By tracked market cap: XAUT0 (Solana) measures $9.30M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, XAUT0 or CRD?

On the contract checks we publish: XAUT0 (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have XAUT0 and CRD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show XAUT0 at −0.76% and CRD at 0.00%.

More comparisons

XAUT0 vs RYYXAUT0 vs FKBXAUT0 vs RDKXAUT0 vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.